"Mike and the FBI"
last updated 11/03/10
First, before any conclusions can be made about the FBI, it must be stated that the FBI will not comment about ongoing investigations, so it is hard for me to know if the FBI is doing any kind of investigation into the complaints I have filed.
For all I know, the FBI may be ready to indict the gang at AT&T and the CPUC.
With that being said, read the following "short" version of the FBI noted below (for the long version of my contacts with the FBI see:FBI communication history, long version )
Congresswoman Tauscher requested the FBI to identify what the above noted numbers are in May 2008. The FBI has refused to answer the question.
If the FBI were to "officially" acknowledge that the above "RSA" phone number has the last five digits of "25093," and not "85093" as the phone company claimed in court documents, or that the letters "RSA" identified the phone number as being mine, and not someone elses phone number, as the phone company claimed in court documents, the FBI would be obligated to open an investigation into Corporate Fraud.
The act of perjury (claiming the phone number had the last five digits of "85093") was so blatent, that when combined with other fraudulant statements made by the CPUC Judge, as well as the Judge's refusal to follow the Rule of Law, and a lack of signatures on the Denial for Rehearing, it became obvious the Judge is corrupt. See: The Corrupt Judge and the "admittedly defective DAML" , The Corrupt Judge and legal error , The Corrupt Judge and Altered Repair Records , The Corrupt Judge and the Denial for Rehearing. Corrupt Judges are within FBI jurisdiction, as are corporations that lie to state agencies.
The following links shown below provide specific facts for the FBI to investigate, and also show the FBI why a successful investigation can be used to establish laws that would prevent problems caused by phone company fraud and corruption.
The Corrupt Judge:
• The Corrupt Judge, the Fictional Phone Number, and a blatant act of Perjury
• The Corrupt Judge and Altered Repair Records
• The Corrupt Judge and the "admittedly defective DAML"
• The Corrupt Judge and legal error
• The Corrupt Judge and the Denial for Rehearing
Technical Documents:
• The Log of Defective Cable Pairs: A document that could only be obtained through photography
• Cable Pair 1118: History of Failures, and no history of Repair
• MLT Test Results of Cable Pairs on my Street
• "RSA" Cable pair identification
Legal Definitions:
• Fraud and the Statute of Limitations
• LMOS COSMOS. ALTERED RECORDS and Violations to law
Cover-ups and acts of perjury:
• Protected Services and Supervisor Escorts (the final pieces of the puzzle)
• The Answer to the Formal Complaint (and the first act of perjury)
• The Answer to the Formal Complaint (and the second act of perjury)
• Four trucks and photographs of the first two acts of perjury
• Another act of perjury (Sloppy, lazy, Motion to Dismiss)
• Rule 11, a Scary Number (with phoney death threats)
Human Nature, Unfair Laws, and a Simple Solution:
• Illegal Mechanisms to Conceal Recurring Problems
• Human Nature and predictable frauds
• A Simple Solution, a Consumers' Bill of Rights
Letters from Government Agencies
• Letters from the FBI, FCC, Congresswoman Tauscher, and the State Attorney General
• An unreasonable request for an extension
High resolution photographs of repair work (that Pacific Bell said never happened) and internal documents that provide proof of fraud:
Wet box and testing http://www.mikeandmabell.com/353_hi-res.html
Technicians testing cable pairs http://www.mikeandmabell.com/358_hi-res.html
Technician with MLT document and log of defective cable pairs http://www.mikeandmabell.com/359_hi-res.html
Technician with TDR meter www.mikeandmabell.com/360_hi-res.html
Smoking gun http://www.mikeandmabell.com/362_hi-res.html
MLT document, cable pair 1134 http://www.mikeandmabell.com/363_hi-res.html
Log of defective cable pairs photo 1 http://www.mikeandmabell.com/364_hi-res.html
Log of defective cable pairs photo 2 http://www.mikeandmabell.com/365_hi-res.html
• Archive of 9/2007–7/2008 articles by Don McCarty, from OSP Network Solutions
• Archived Don McCarty article dated March 2007, OSP Network Solutions
• Archived Don McCarty article dated October 2006, OSP Network Solutions
• Archived article about talk given by Don McCarty, September 2005, Business Wire
• Archived article by Don McCarty, OSP Magazine May 2009, "What Does It Take to Get a Cable Replaced?"
Testimony, Briefs, Responses before the California Public Utilities Commission:
• Direct Testimony of Ginger L.Henry on Behalf of Pacific Bell Telephone Company
• Direct Testimony of Bob Alex on Behalf of Pacific Bell Telephone Company
• Opening Brief, Pacific Bell Telephone Company. July 3, 2002
• Supplemental Brief, Pacific Bell Telephone Company. July 3, 2002
• Response to M. Knell's Appeal, Pacific Bell Telephone Company. May 2003
• Response to M. Knell's Application for Rehearing,
Pacific Bell Telephone Company. October 2003
• Testimony of Rod Aguilar on behalf of AT&T. June 2002
• Brief of Defendant AT&T Communications of California, July 3, 2002
• Supplemental Brief of Defendant AT&T Communications of California, August 2002
• AT&T's Redline of Reply Brief of Mike Knell
• Mike Knell Supplemental Brief. July 2002
• Amendment to C.01-07-034. July 29, 2002
• Mike Knell's Application for a Rehearing. September 2003
More testimony and replies are being prepared for publishing on this site now. (January 27, 2009)
• Document under construction - 5
• Document under construction - 6
• Document under construciton - 8
• edited out for simplicity - 10
• Congressman McNerney January 26, 2009
• Declaration of bad service by former neighbor
• Document under construction - 17
• Document under construction - 18
• Document under construction - 19
• Document under construction - 20
FBI communication history, long version
• A certified letter and an act of perjury
• Another certified letter, and more acts of perjury
• Yet another certified letter, and another violation to public utility law
• A phone bill, and an act of perjury