"Mike and the FBI"
My Congresswoman requested the FBI to identify what the above noted numbers are. The FBI has refused to answer the question -- costing California millions of dollars.
If the FBI were to "officially" acknowledge that the above "RSA" phone number has the last five digits of "25093," and not "85093" as the phone company claimed in court documents, or that the letters "RSA" identified the phone number as being mine, and not someone elses phone number, as the phone company claimed in court documents, the FBI would be obligated to open an investigation into Corporate Fraud.
I have been trying to get the FBI to look at the above photograph, and open an investigation linked to the above phone number, since July 2007. The high resolution photograph can be seen on this link: http://www.mikeandmabell.com/362_hi-res.html
To make a long story short, the "RSA"phone number is my phone number. It proved the phone company violated laws each and every day, since 1996, costing me a great deal of money. To avoid paying fines to the State of California that could have exceeded $100 million, and to avoid compensating me for business losses, the phone company commited perjury by telling the California Public Utilities Commission the number has the last five digits of "85093," and that it was not my phone number.
The act of perjury was so blatent, that when combined with other fraudulant statements made by the CPUC Judge, as well as the Judge's refusal to follow the Rule of Law, and a lack of signatures on the Denial for Rehearing, it became obvious the Judge is corrupt. See: The Corrupt Judge and the "admittedly defective DAML" , The Corrupt Judge and legal error , The Corrupt Judge and Altered Repair Records , The Corrupt Judge and the Denial for Rehearing. Corrupt Judges are within FBI jurisdiction, as are corporations that lie to state agencies.
From July 2007 through April 2008 (over nine months), the FBI was not cooperative, literally, refusing to make a determination of whether the phone number has the last five digits of "25093" as I claim, or "85093" as the phone company claimed. On April 30, 2008, an FBI agent told me that I should have moved when the phone problems affected my business. The laws are very clear, a person should not have to move because a phone company does not want to repair a phone line.
It wasn't until my Congresswoman got involved that the FBI began cooperating. See FBI communication history for the long version of my contacts with the FBI, and the evidence I obtained in July 2007, which caused me to contact the FBI.
From May 2008 through July 2008, the FBI verbally agreed the number shown above is my phone number. On July 8, 2008, FBI agent Mandy told me she would file a report in an attempt to open an investigation. On August 14, 2008, she told me the FBI would not open an investigation and to, "let it go." I told her I wanted to see the report she filed, to see if it was accurate, she told me she would have to talk to her supervisor. On August 22, 2008, the FBI called, told me it could not make a determination if the number was mine, and again, told me to go away.
The most important reason for the FBI to acknowledge the phone number is my phone number, is to establish a Telecommunications Consumers' Bill of Rights. If Barack Obama or John McCain were to acknowledge phone number was mine, and promise to establish a federal telecommunications consumer's bill of rights, they would get a lot more votes.
On Friday, May 16, 2008. My Congresswoman sent a letter to the FBI San Francisco office, asking if the phone number in the photograph is a "2" (as I claim) or an "8" (as AT&T claims), and to respond in writing, to me. Despite my claims that this was within FBI jurisdiction, copies of the letter were sent to the CPUC, the State Attorney General Jerry Brown, and Senator Don Perata, as well as a note in the letter that she did not believe this to be an FBI matter.
The State Attorney General responded with the following letter, confirming it cannot investigate a corrupt judge or a corrupt commission -- State law forbids it. It should also be noted that I had already contacted the California Bureau of State Audits, which had done nothing.
The Attorney General had no legal obligation to respond to me. The tone of the letter was very polite -- unlike the letters I have received from the CPUC. My interpretation of the Attorney General letter is that it went as far as it could legally go, in saying this is an FBI matter, without actually saying this is an FBI matter. Cc'ing the letter to my Congresswoman reinforces my belief that the Attorney General wants my Congresswoman to continue to help me.
On July 8, 2008. FBI Agent Mandy called. As a result of the Congresswoman's letter, she agreed verbally, that the phone number had the last five digits of "25093" as I claimed. She agreed this was within FBI jurisdiction, and she stated she would submit the evidence to her superiors to see if my complaint met the criteria necessary to open an investigation.
August 14, 2008. I called Agent Mandy, and asked what was happening with my complaint. She told me she forwarded my complaint to the corruption department. She told me that since I hadn't heard from the FBI, that they would not open an investigation, and that I should just "let it go."
August 15, 2008. My brother and I wrote to our Congresswoman, telling her that the SF FBI office refused to respond to her letter dated 05/16/08. Karen Tedford, my Congresswoman's case worker, was clearly frustrated by the situation. She asked me what I think needs to be done. I told her that because the SF Office won't answer the letter, she should send a letter to Kenneth W. Kaiser, the assistant director of the FBI, (who wrote a letter dated March 28, 2008, see: FBI communication history ), and ask that he answer the question of whether the number is a "2" or an "8". Karen Teford refused to comply with the request, telling me she orders from Washington. On August 20, 2008 a staff member in Washington DC, explained that they cannot ask a question more than once, because it is considered "disrepectful."
August 18, 2008. I called the FBI, and asked to speak to the Special Agent in Charge (SAC). The duty agent asked, "Is this Mike Knell?" When I answered, "yes," she said she was Agent Mandy, and she laughed. I told her that I would not give up trying to get the FBI to open an investigation. I asked to see the complaint she filed, to see if it was accurate. She said she would contact her supervisor to see if I could look it.
August 19, 2008. Below: E-mail response from Rep. Tauscher to me. Sadly, the email twists words when it states, "I am writing in response to your correspondence with my office regarding efforts to determine whether a document from your telecommuncations carrier contained fraudulant information." My original request was to determine if the phone company committed perjury when it stated the phone number in the document at the top of this page had the last five digits of "85093.".
August 22, 2008. An anonymous FBI agent called.
This was a very disturbing call, as it became quite clear the FBI is protecting somebody. He told me the FBI looked at this webpage (and the links), and the FBI will not open an investigation.
I asked if he could determine if the number at the top of this page was a "2" or an "8". He said, "I cannot make that determination." He told me he wasn't a specialist in looking at numbers. I asked if he had consulted with an FBI "specialist" who could determine what the number is. He refused to answer.
I also asked if he could determine if the phone number was mine, based on the letters "RSA". Again, the FBI agent told me he could not make that determination. When I asked what his title was, he told me he was a "Special agent." I asked if his superviors had told him to tell me to go away. He would not answer the question -- basically, he told me not to come back to the FBI office.
The tone of the call was more of a threat than anything else. The fact that the FBI claims they cannot make a determination that the phone number is mine, makes the FBI agent just as corrupt as the Judge, and just as costly to society.
To Report a Complaint about Waste, Fraud, Abuse, or Misconduct in the Department of Justice
The following links shown below provide specific facts for the FBI to investigate, and also show the FBI how a successful investigation can be used to establish laws that would prevent problems caused by phone company fraud and corruption.
The Corrupt Judge:
• The Corrupt Judge, the Fictional Phone Number, and a blatant act of Perjury
• The Corrupt Judge and Altered Repair Records
• The Corrupt Judge and the "admittedly defective DAML"
• The Corrupt Judge and legal error
• The Corrupt Judge and the Denial for Rehearing
Technical Documents:
• The Log of Defective Cable Pairs: A document that could only be obtained through photography
• Cable Pair 1118: History of Failures, and no history of Repair
• MLT Test Results of Cable Pairs on my Street
• "RSA" Cable pair identification
Legal Definitions:
• Fraud and the Statute of Limitations
• LMOS COSMOS. ALTERED RECORDS and Violations to law
Cover-ups and acts of perjury:
• Protected Services and Supervisor Escorts (the final pieces of the puzzle)
• The Answer to the Formal Complaint (and the first act of perjury)
• The Answer to the Formal Complaint (and the second act of perjury)
• Four trucks and photographs of the first two acts of perjury
• Another act of perjury (Sloppy, lazy, Motion to Dismiss)
• Rule 11, a Scary Number (with phoney death threats)
Human Nature, Unfair Laws, and a Simple Solution:
• Illegal Mechanisms to Conceal Recurring Problems
• Human Nature and predictable frauds
• A Simple Solution, a Consumers' Bill of Rights
Letters from Government Agencies
• Letters from the FBI, FCC, Congresswoman Tauscher, and the State Attorney General
• An unreasonable request for an extension
High resolution photographs of repair work (that Pacific Bell said never happened) and internal documents that provide proof of fraud:
Wet box and testing http://www.mikeandmabell.com/353_hi-res.html
Technicians testing cable pairs http://www.mikeandmabell.com/358_hi-res.html
Technician with MLT document and log of defective cable pairs http://www.mikeandmabell.com/359_hi-res.html
Technician with TDR meter www.mikeandmabell.com/360_hi-res.html
Smoking gun http://www.mikeandmabell.com/362_hi-res.html
MLT document, cable pair 1134 http://www.mikeandmabell.com/363_hi-res.html
Log of defective cable pairs photo 1 http://www.mikeandmabell.com/364_hi-res.html
Log of defective cable pairs photo 2 http://www.mikeandmabell.com/365_hi-res.html
• Archive of 9/2007–7/2008 articles by Don McCarty, from OSP Network Solutions
• Archived Don McCarty article dated March 2007, OSP Network Solutions
• Archived Don McCarty article dated October 2006, OSP Network Solutions
• Archived article about talk given by Don McCarty, September 2005, Business Wire
The Violations by the "old AT&T". Listing problems, privacy violations, billing problems, illegal service restrictions, perjury, refusal to put corrections to listings in writing, suggesting I move for better phone service, refusal to provide business mailing address, the Rod Aguilar and Patelco conspiracy theory, the refusal to remove my home address from directories and mailing lists, and the Commission's refusal to follow the Rule of law
• Document under construction 4
• Document under construction - 5
• Document under construction - 6
• Document under construction - 7
• Document under construciton - 8
• edited out for simplicity - 10
• A certified letter and an act of perjury
• Another certified letter, and more acts of perjury
• Yet another certified letter, and another violation to public utility law
• A phone bill, and an act of perjury
last edited 08/23/08